<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Web Write 101 &#187; navigation</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.webwrite101.com/blog/tag/navigation/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.webwrite101.com/blog</link>
	<description>Sue Davis' writing for the web blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 Jun 2010 09:46:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Alphabetical navigation is meaningless</title>
		<link>http://www.webwrite101.com/blog/2009/06/alphabetical-navs/</link>
		<comments>http://www.webwrite101.com/blog/2009/06/alphabetical-navs/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2009 10:29:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sue Davis</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[navigation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.webwrite101.com/blog/?p=158</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Organising web content alphabetically is such an arbitrary way to do it. It is akin to random order.
As Jared Spool says:
Alphabetization is a lazy designer&#8217;s out — it tells me that the design team isn&#8217;t interested in finding out what users are really doing on the site.
Here&#8217;s an interesting debate between Jared and some defenders [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Organising web content alphabetically is such an arbitrary way to do it. It is akin to random order.</p>
<p>As Jared Spool says:</p>
<blockquote><p>Alphabetization is a lazy designer&#8217;s out — it tells me that the design team isn&#8217;t interested in finding out what users are really doing on the site.</p></blockquote>
<p>Here&#8217;s an interesting <a href="http://www.ixda.org/discuss.php?post=30259" target="_blank">debate</a> between Jared and some defenders of alphabetical organisation.</p>
<p>Your job as an editor is to make sense of the information for the reader, to effectively &#8216;de-randomise&#8217;, to group the mass of site information and prioritise.</p>
<h2>The Next Woman</h2>
<p>OK, an example of a site where they order their navigation alphabetically is <a href="http://thenextwomen.com" target="_blank">The Next Woman</a>.</p>
<div id="attachment_163" class="wp-caption alignleft" style="width: 160px"><a href="http://thenextwomen.com" target="_blank"><img class="size-thumbnail wp-image-163" title="The Next Woman" src="http://www.webwrite101.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/06/Picture-6-150x150.png" alt="The Next Woman screen grab" width="150" height="150" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">The Next Woman screen grab</p></div>
<p>Look at the top right navigation scheme. They haven&#8217;t prioritised or grouped the sections. Some are obviously editorial sections &#8211; Simone&#8217;s List and Female Hero of the month. But some are admin areas &#8211; Subscribe, Contact, About. Mixing them up feels wrong. For an online mag for female internet heros they need to find an information architect or editor who understands the web for credibility sake.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.webwrite101.com/blog/2009/06/alphabetical-navs/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
